SingularIntegralEquations.jl
SingularIntegralEquations.jl copied to clipboard
OffHilbert -> Stieltjes?
Should OffHilbert be multiplied by -π and renamed Stieltjes? This matches the function call stieltjes which is now overwritten.
I used to think that the calculus_operator macro was the best way forward, but could all the singular_integral_operator's benefit from their own macro/code generation? Something like SingularIntegral(one_space,...) should default to SingularIntegral(domainspace,rangespace,...) so that there is no need to distinguish between On/Off operators. Is +/- for Cauchy an issue?
I think the +- operators make it a bit difficult. But I guess we could have the relationship:
Hilbert(f,k) = (Hilbert(+,f,k) + Hilbert(-,f,k))/2
In the special case of log kernel k = 0, all three are the same.
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Nov 2015, at 8:20 PM, Richard Mikael Slevinsky [email protected] wrote:
I used to think that the calculus_operator macro was the best way forward, but could all the singular_integral_operator's benefit from their own macro/code generation? Something like SingularIntegral(one_space,...) should default to SingularIntegral(domainspace,rangespace,...) so that there is no need to distinguish between On/Off operators. Is +/- for Cauchy an issue?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.