Jukka Lehtosalo
Jukka Lehtosalo
This has the problem that a type checker doesn't see inside the implementations of stubbed classes, and you could break some of the base class methods without a type checker...
The QPixmap example shouldn't be a problem, since it seems to be for a library stub file. We don't verify that stubs are correct anyway, so a stub would be...
I have a related proposal. What about having a magic class decorator (with no runtime or minimal effect) or a base class that declares a class as a "pure mixin"?...
@gvanrossum I've seen mixins like that (that use things that aren't defined anywhere in the mixin class). I'm not sure how common they are. @ilevkivskyi Looks good. I'd do some...
Also, I'm not at all attached to the `puremixin` name.
Created #246 for pure mixins.
Let's move the discussion of mixins to #246?
The point about incremental checking is a good one. General performance could also be an important concern if people would start using this more widely. My expectation would be that...
Agreed with the importance of those two. I'm no longer sure if "builder" -> "converter" is the best way do to it. An alternative would be to only maintain a...
I'm working on simplifying `Environment`.