Josh Smith

@ChargrilledChook Yeah I'd be interested in working on it. Also definitely interested in seeing your draft, I feel like you have a lot of good knowledge with debugging.

@ChargrilledChook I agree with basically every point in the issue body I think. Some of my thoughts: - Moving away from `pry` is a good idea with `rdbg` in standard...

@ChargrilledChook Yeah, I can get started on that. Would it be okay if I replaced the current `pry` content with `binding.irb`? There's only one example given that shows any stepping,...

Thank you for the detailed issue and for bringing attention to this 🙌 > FWIW it looks like #27128 will probably help with this, so feel free to close this...

@MaoShizhong Nice call! This issue should be solved since the project now has users set up a Gemfile. Closed by #27128

I think it's a cool idea to bring this stuff in-house for a couple of reasons: 1. Similar to the exercises in foundations, our provided tests can make sure learners'...

Alright revisiting this because I have some time to pursue it. Is this still something you're interested in working on @nikitarevenco ?

Awesome. Before we start, we can think some about what exercises we want to do. One of the nice things about moving this in-house is that we have full control...

I think most of those options have cool potential. I'm maybe a bit skeptical of greatest common denominator. It's definitely a famous recursion problem, but I don't think learners are...

Actually let's keep things a bit constrained to start. Maybe we can move faster after we get things rolling, but for now, let's try to keep PRs small. We'll definitely...