Jonathan Magnan

On my side, is still slightly faster ;( Is it always slower on your side?

Here are some example of my result ```txt Warm up: 00:00:06.9428095 >> Include: 00:00:04.4415727 total, 00:00:00.1106871 DB command execution. >> IncludeOptimized: 00:00:03.9408031 total, 00:00:00.0037523 DB command execution. Warm up: 00:00:07.5438154...

Yup, This was a good try, however ;) The good thing is we will re-visit this feature during the year through the project: https://entityframework-classic.net/ So some part will be optimized...

Hello @psyren89 , Thank you for reporting, we successfully reproduced the issue. We will look at if that's possible to fix it for `EF Core`. Best Regards, Jonathan --- **Performance...

Hello @megumus , I don't think anything will be done until we completely re-write this feature. If I remember well, that issue was caused by how `EF Core` generate the...

Hello @thebestgin , Do you think you could provide a **runnable project sample** for this issue? It will help my developer to get started to investigate it faster and make...

Hello @thebestgin A simple reminder that we are here to assist you! Don't hesitate to send your runnable project sample to our support team [email protected] Best regards, Jon

Thank a lot, My developer will look at this.

Unfortunately, we have currently way more requests than we can handle during the summer. This request is currently in a pending state on our side. Once we complete all the...

Hello @thebestgin , The `FutureAction` in EFE works very differently than `FutureValue` in `EF Plus`. In fact, `FutureAction` just creates a pending list that will be executed later. So on...