Jonathan Magnan

Hello @m-hicks-OH , Indeed, the [BulkSaveChanges](https://entityframework-extensions.net/bulk-savechanges) method will not help you. The `BulkSaveChanges` generates his command the same way as `SaveChanges` does. Leading quickly to the same memory issue when...

Hello @m-hicks-OH , Since our last conversation, we haven't heard from you. Let me know if you need more information. Best regards. Jon

Hello @Alexey39dev , Indeed our library doesn't yet support custom type like your, and as you added in your project, you currently need to ignore it with the option **IgnoreColumnOutputExpression**...

Hello @m-hicks-OH , Indeed, we do not yet support this scenario where the FK is defined on the child, as we are not currently looking at the ChangeTracker. We are...

Hello @m-hicks-OH , Unfortunately, we don't have a solution ready for your exact scenario through the `IncludeGraph` However, one will eventually come. We are currently developing a solution that will...

Hello Michael, If you are using EF Core, the trial will already work until the end of November. At mid-November, we will already have a version released with the trial...

Hello @m-hicks-OH , Indeed, if you use **EF Core**, the v8.103.6 trial will be enabled until the end of November. Giving you plenty of time for your setup ;) Best...

Hello @ednsinf , We didn't get any error even after inserting 20M rows: ```csharp MyDatabase myDatabase = new MyDatabase(); for(int i = 0; i < 20000000; i++) { myDatabase.Tests.Insert(new Test()...

Hello @jzabroski , After reviewing our code, it could be possible to skip the concurrency check. This means that in the case of a concurrency scenario, the entity will not...

Hello @jzabroski, Since our last conversation, we haven't heard from you. Let me know if you need further assistance. Best regards, Jon