joinmarket-clientserver icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
joinmarket-clientserver copied to clipboard

Bitcoin CoinJoin implementation with incentive structure to convince people to take part

Results 218 joinmarket-clientserver issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

As an example there is a coinjoin with 5-7 outputs that have a uniform output value of 0.123 Can it be assumed that the first of these outputs to be...

question

See https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver/issues/673#issuecomment-700945634 as a summary of that thread as a whole, the commit which closed that thread did only the "easy" thing of shutting down, and the issue is rather...

enhancement

It seems that the wallet-tool includes unconfirmed transactions in the balance view (`./wallet-tool.py -v6`), but excludes them from the history view (`./wallet-tool.py -v6 history`). Is there a reason for this...

When I want to check the wallet history, either using JoininBox or "python wallet-tool.py walletName.jmdat history" I get the below error. However, the display of the TXs is correct. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------...

Was thinking about a safe way for YieldGenerator to restart safely in: https://github.com/openoms/joininbox/issues/17 Question is if the Maker would not sign a transaction resulting to losing funds does it need...

I saw that the QT guide references the `max_mix_depth` setting. When I grep the code, I can't find any other user-facing mentions of this setting. I also couldn't find it...

`jmclient.wallet.PSBTWalletMixin` only currently supports signing of standard scriptPubKey types - `p2sh-p2wpkh` and `p2wpkh`, i.e. our two Joinmarket wallet types. It doesn't support signing of any other scriptPubKey, and this would/will...

enhancement
help wanted

I am using the Joinmarket Qt on the RaspiBlitz. I have tried several times to run the tumbler (Coinjoin/Multiple Join) and always got the following behavior, which in my opinion...

See the discussion in #859 . Any output type other than v0 P2WPKH currently identifies the output as belonging to the taker or the taker's payee. Further, this presents a...

enhancement
help wanted
good first issue

I was thinking about this for some time already, but now, in a high fee environment, this becomes more critical. Currently taker is the one who decides on Bitcoin transaction...

protocol