Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña
Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña
Luckily, it seems that EWG approved the CTAD patches, says https://botondballo.wordpress.com/2018/11/30/trip-report-c-standards-meeting-in-san-diego-november-2018/.
There's also https://github.com/nholthaus/units/pull/217#issuecomment-436797746. The next committee meeting (http://wg21.link/N4783, July 15 – 20, 2019) is the last opportunity to put into the WD the CTAD wording for alias templates for C++20....
Class Template Argument Deduction for Alias Templates made it in for the C++20 CD (https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/566).
Yes. I'll get to it right away.
Very well. Might I suggest documenting the use of epsilon in the comparisons?
https://github.com/nholthaus/units/blob/40e425ff25fe7739d167d9958ce84d5522510b7d/include/units.h#L3114 ~~It's just a copy&paste of that line with the new spelling.~~ Actually, that shouldn't work because you'd try to redefine `m`.
There's work towards the third point in #150, thought it's between many other changes. I'm thinking of splitting them out to other PRs. [This is the syntax](https://github.com/nholthaus/units/issues/138#issuecomment-398226286). I've been thinking...
The problem is that libraries are being built with concrete types, rather than being constrained with concepts. If a concept such as `Number` were used instead for a math library,...
I made a mistake. It can actually be specialized for program-defined types. I was corrected at https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3/issues/1516#issuecomment-652673876.