JoeLametta
JoeLametta
> unsure why replaygain isn't in the scope of whipper (?) redirected here. Well, whipper is just a ripper (not a tagging tool, etc.). > allowing processing of the output...
> Is this intentional It's intentional (meaning it's currently coded as such) but can be changed if it's a brainless behaviour. https://github.com/whipper-team/whipper/blob/bbf1eba0e44a743a30e07b445a9a77e5deac9451/whipper/common/program.py#L249 https://github.com/whipper-team/whipper/blob/bbf1eba0e44a743a30e07b445a9a77e5deac9451/whipper/common/program.py#L460
> For the first two cases, I was able to produce a patch locally that reads & applies the pregap data when it is available. Thanks, are you willing to...
Any progress on this?
> Can we add rips to the database to help it grow? Not really: if I recall correctly the only softwares allowed to submit records to AccurateRip are dbPoweramp (Windows...
> Technically it is not impossible to do this, but will require some reverse engineering of the AccurateRip code/binary/dll. Or just sniff the protocol. Whether EAC/dbP will like it is...
> If this is "wontfix", why is it still open? Either the "wontfix" label should be removed, or this should be closed… ? Yeah, I'm going to close it now...
Hi. Unfortunately at the moment I'm quite busy: don't have enough time to learn how to do this. If anybody wants to contribute this feature with a pull request, I'll...
@mruszczyk Any news about this one?
@mruszczyk Any progress on this?