outline-server icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
outline-server copied to clipboard

[feat]: support build for multi-arch builds

Open oreoluwa opened this issue 4 years ago • 7 comments

@JonathanDCohen closing https://github.com/Jigsaw-Code/outline-server/pull/496 in favor of this. With seihon we can easily publish the image for multiple platforms and architectures using the docker manifest feature, while providing a build template. the image that is ultimately deployed would be runnable on any of the supported platforms. By default seihon builds for arm.v6, arm.v7, arm.v8, amd64, 386 however our base image node:8.15.0-alpine doesn't have the arm.v7 manifest included, but the v7 architecture can run v6 build. Please let me know your thoughts on this.

oreoluwa avatar Mar 03 '20 00:03 oreoluwa

All (the pull request submitter and all commit authors) CLAs are signed, but one or more commits were authored or co-authored by someone other than the pull request submitter.

We need to confirm that all authors are ok with their commits being contributed to this project. Please have them confirm that by leaving a comment that contains only @googlebot I consent. in this pull request.

Note to project maintainer: There may be cases where the author cannot leave a comment, or the comment is not properly detected as consent. In those cases, you can manually confirm consent of the commit author(s), and set the cla label to yes (if enabled on your project).

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

googlebot avatar Mar 03 '20 00:03 googlebot

@googlebot I consent.

oreoluwa avatar Mar 03 '20 00:03 oreoluwa

@googlebot I consent.

andela-oakinniranye avatar Mar 03 '20 13:03 andela-oakinniranye

CLAs look good, thanks!

ℹ️ Googlers: Go here for more info.

googlebot avatar Mar 03 '20 13:03 googlebot

seihon looks really cool, but on https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/commandline/manifest/ it warns that docker manifests are still experimental and shouldn't be used in production.

@alalamav @fortuna Maybe we could push experimental or unstable manifest lists until docker manifest stabilizes? Otherwise we could do this the hard way without docker manifest

And I guess also we should hold until we can get full arm support. I don't know what the distribution is like in the wild of the different versions of arm devices.

JonathanDCohen avatar Mar 03 '20 18:03 JonathanDCohen

And I guess also we should hold until we can get full arm support. I don't know what the distribution is like in the wild of the different versions of arm devices.

There are ARM's in the cloud. Could we get arch-tagged images while docker manifest is still experimental?

lomax avatar Oct 27 '21 19:10 lomax

Any update on this?

richardzone avatar Mar 16 '22 17:03 richardzone