JetBrainsRuntime
JetBrainsRuntime copied to clipboard
The input of Linux Fcitx displays abnormally
OS: Ubuntu 20.04 IDEA: 2021.1.3 Runtime Version: 11.0.11+9-b1341.60 amd64
This problem existed in the 2020.1 version, and it was not fixed until the 2021.1.3 version. This is a serious bug that affects usage. Some developers in the community have provided patches to fix this problem. When can the official incorporate this patch?
Thank you for submitting the issue. We regret the inconvenience caused to you.
Could you please provide us with the detailed description of the problem & steps reproducing this issue?
Some developers in the community have provided patches to fix this problem.
Unfortunately we have got neither pull requests related to this issue nor patches in any other format. Any references to these fix would be appreciated?
Thank you for submitting the issue. We regret the inconvenience caused to you.
Could you please provide us with the detailed description of the problem & steps reproducing this issue?
Some developers in the community have provided patches to fix this problem.
Unfortunately we have got neither pull requests related to this issue nor patches in any other format. Any references to these fix would be appreciated?
Use any fcitx input. When inputting Chinese or Japanese in IDEA, the input software cannot get the focus position of the cursor. This patch is not provided by me, sorry I can’t submit a pull requests. But I can provide a git repository of patches. https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime
I saw a lot of people in the issue and I encountered the same problem.
I encountered the same problem.
I encountered the same problem.
I encountered the same problem.
Have the same issue.
I have the same problem
me too.
I have the same problem
俺也一样
This bug exits with 8 years and with another 6 month passed,it hasn't been fixed yet.This is the discussion about this bug https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/JBR-2460
Unfortunately, this is an upstream OpenJDK bug. Even my own Java window program has this problem. The patch mentioned above can solve both JetBrains softwares and my own one. I guess not only should we ask JetBrians to add that patch but also we should complain that to upstream OpenJDK and Oracle, since if they do not fix it at the upstream, this bug will always be there for Java 17, 21, 28, and so on...
别抱怨了,实际上人民应该付出行动来修正。有没有人提交过pull request。
same problem,please fix it
Unfortunately, this is an upstream OpenJDK bug. Even my own Java window program has this problem. The patch mentioned above can solve both JetBrains softwares and my own one. I guess not only should we ask JetBrians to add that patch but also we should complain that to upstream OpenJDK and Oracle, since if they do not fix it at the upstream, this bug will always be there for Java 17, 21, 28, and so on...
I was going to submit feedback to OpenJDK, but I saw this feedback in OpenJDK's Issue, JDK-8279052.
now the problem is nobody PR. I hope somebody do this
@NikitkoCent Could you please take a look at suggested patches fixing this issue
This patch is not provided by me, sorry I can’t submit a pull requests. But I can provide a git repository of patches. https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime
Could you please report using our bug database https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/JBR
Could you please report using our bug database https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/JBR
Actually, this bug is reported almost 10 years ago. See https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/JBR-2460. And the bug is still not fixed.
I have the same problem
i have the same problem
Could you please report using our bug database https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issues/JBR
Could you please merge this patch so we can close this issue
I encountered the same problem. I searched for various solutions on the Internet and found a patch in the community: https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime However, because the patch is too old and cannot be used directly in the current version of the code, I compared the patch modifications and manually modified the same content in the latest version submission (50933cd23e3c65a4c4ab2f10cc3f230706ab1719), and ensured successful compilation. For this purpose, I forked a warehouse for reference only: https://github.com/Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime/tree/jbr17
At the same time, I generated a new patch file based on the changed content. The file FixedLinuxFcitx.patch
is located in the jbr17
branch of the warehouse. I hope it can be helpful to you.
If the JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
warehouse continues to be updated in the future, I think a convenient way is to merge the contents of the two warehouses JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
and Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime
and recompile, but the validity of subsequent changes cannot be guaranteed.
Sorry I can't submit a pull request, I don't know much about it yet.
I encountered the same problem. I searched for various solutions on the Internet and found a patch in the community: https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime However, because the patch is too old and cannot be used directly in the current version of the code, I compared the patch modifications and manually modified the same content in the latest version submission (50933cd), and ensured successful compilation. For this purpose, I forked a warehouse for reference only: https://github.com/Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime/tree/jbr17
At the same time, I generated a new patch file based on the changed content. The file
FixedLinuxFcitx.patch
is located in thejbr17
branch of the warehouse. I hope it can be helpful to you.If the
JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
warehouse continues to be updated in the future, I think a convenient way is to merge the contents of the two warehousesJetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
andYu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime
and recompile, but the validity of subsequent changes cannot be guaranteed.Sorry I can't submit a pull request, I don't know much about it yet.
They have already had an official try on this issue https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/JBR-2460/Wrong-position-of-input-window-and-no-input-preview-with-fcitx-and-ubuntu-13.04
it's Fixed in JBR builds: jbr17.1162.7
I encountered the same problem. I searched(搜索) for various solutions on the Internet and found(发现) a patch(补丁) in the community(社区): https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime我遇到了同样的问题。我在互联网上搜索了各种解决方案,并在社区中找到了一个补丁:https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime However, because the patch(补丁) is too old and cannot be used(使用) directly(直接) in the current(当前) version(版本) of the code(代码), I compared the patch(补丁) modifications and manually modified the same content(内容) in the latest version(版本) submission (50933cd), and ensured successful(成功) compilation. For this purpose(宗旨), I forked a warehouse(仓库) for reference(参考) only: https://github.com/Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime/tree/jbr17但是,由于补丁太旧,无法在当前版本的代码中直接使用,所以我在最新版本提交( 50933cd )中对比了补丁修改并手动修改了相同的内容,并确保编译成功。为此,我分叉了一个仓库仅供参考:https://github.com/Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime/tree/jbr17
At the same time, I generated a new patch(补丁) file based on the changed content(内容). The file
FixedLinuxFcitx.patch
is located in thejbr17
branch(分公司) of the warehouse(仓库). I hope it can be helpful(乐于助人) to you.同时,我根据更改的内容生成了一个新的补丁文件。该文件FixedLinuxFcitx.patch
位于仓库的jbr17
分支中。希望对您有所帮助。If the
JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
warehouse(仓库) continues to be updated in the future(未来), I think a convenient(方便) way is to merge(合并) the contents(内容) of the two warehouses(仓库)JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
andYu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime
and recompile, but the validity(有效性) of subsequent(后续) changes cannot be guaranteed.如果以后仓库继续更新,我觉得方便的办法是合并两个JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
仓库的内容JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
,Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime
然后重新编译,但后续更改的有效性无法保证。Sorry I can't submit(提交) a pull request(请求), I don't know much about it yet.对不起,我无法提交拉取请求,我还不太了解。
This problem has been fixed in the official repository
I encountered the same problem. I searched for various solutions on the Internet and found a patch in the community: https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime However, because the patch is too old and cannot be used directly in the current version of the code, I compared the patch modifications and manually modified the same content in the latest version submission (50933cd), and ensured successful compilation. For this purpose, I forked a warehouse for reference only: https://github.com/Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime/tree/jbr17我遇到了同样的问题。我在网上搜索了各种解决方案,在社区里找到了一个补丁: https://github.com/prehonor/myJetBrainsRuntime 但是,由于补丁太旧,无法在当前版本的代码中直接使用,所以我对比了补丁修改,并在最新版本提交(50933cd)中手动修改了相同的内容,并确保编译成功。为此,我分叉了一个仓库仅供参考:https://github.com/Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime/tree/jbr17 At the same time, I generated a new patch file based on the changed content. The file
FixedLinuxFcitx.patch
is located in thejbr17
branch of the warehouse. I hope it can be helpful to you.同时,我根据更改的内容生成了一个新的补丁文件。该文件FixedLinuxFcitx.patch
位于仓库的jbr17
分支中。希望对您有所帮助。 If theJetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
warehouse continues to be updated in the future, I think a convenient way is to merge the contents of the two warehousesJetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
andYu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime
and recompile, but the validity of subsequent changes cannot be guaranteed.如果以后仓库继续更新,我觉得方便的办法是合并两个JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
仓库的内容JetBrains/JetBrainsRuntime
,Yu-Xiao-Sheng/JetBrainsRuntime
然后重新编译,但后续更改的有效性无法保证。 Sorry I can't submit a pull request, I don't know much about it yet.对不起,我无法提交拉取请求,我还不太了解。They have already had an official try on this issue https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/JBR-2460/Wrong-position-of-input-window-and-no-input-preview-with-fcitx-and-ubuntu-13.04他们已经对这个问题进行了正式尝试 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/JBR-2460/Wrong-position-of-input-window-and-no-input-preview-with-fcitx-and-ubuntu-13.04
it's Fixed in JBR builds: jbr17.1162.7它在 JBR 版本中已修复:jbr17.1162.7
Great, it turned out to be recently fixed!
@Yu-Xiao-Sheng try 2023.3.2, it just works like a charm
@Yu-Xiao-Sheng try 2023.3.2, it just works like a charm试试 2023.3.2,它就像一个魅力
Yes, I am using Intellij IDEA2023.3.2 on Ubuntu22.04. Unfortunately, I also encountered this problem. Apart from this problem, it works really well.
I'm not sure if it's normal for other people to be in this kind of environment
@Yu-Xiao-Sheng try 2023.3.2, it just works like a charm试试 2023.3.2,它就像一个魅力
Yes, I am using Intellij IDEA2023.3.2 on Ubuntu22.04. Unfortunately, I also encountered this problem. Apart from this problem, it works really well.
I'm not sure if it's normal for other people to be in this kind of environment
which input method are you using? ibus or fcitx5?
What's your JBR version of Intellij IDEA 2023.3.2 ? I've tried PHPStorm/Goland/Ride 2023.3.2, both works well with fcitx5
can you paste the output of this command ?
env |grep -i IM_