Jesús Torrado

Hi @williamjameshandley @lukashergt . Sorry for taking so long to come back to this! Looking at the changes in this PR, they can be grouped as a) clik-related (`planck_clik.py`) b)...

`clik` done in master. Waiting for updates on the `camb.mathutils.chi_squared` cases.

Noted, thanks! Will test very soon. Just to confirm, the point that you are testing is - CLASS: `{'A_s': 2.101e-09, 'n_s': 0.9649, 'Omega_k': -0.09356700887015484, '100*theta_s': 1.0409, 'omega_b': 0.019917603023102904, 'omega_cdm': 0.04158160052940407,...

Thanks, I'll give it a try. If you are unable to reproduce it, it does sound ulgy: may be due to persistence of some memory allocation between clik calls. We'll...

Hi @ShazAlvi It's certainly strange! Could you please run the mcmc case again with the `--debug` option (or `debug: True` in the yaml) and post here a chunk of the...

Hi @ShazAlvi It doesn't seem that output you posted above for mcmc was generated with `debug: True`: it prints way more information, in particular, per iteration, what quantities are passed...

Hi @timothydmorton, and thanks for the issue report! It has, I am afraid: some parameters do not map one-to-one between CAMB and CLASS (especially those about the neutrino sector), so,...

Good! I take note to keep you in the loop when I revisit the issue then (maybe by dropping some thought here in this issue). Thanks for the nice words!...

I was not able to add it to 2.0, sorry (waiting for a CLASS update that has not yet arrived).

Thanks @kimmywu ! CLASS can be done later, or on demand (a bit busy right now) Since for likelihood requisites we use `Cl` for lensed Cl's and `unlensed_Cl` for unlensed...