Jeremy Ruston

Hi @Arlen22 it's an interesting suggestion that hasn't come up before: to support an alternative plugin format that compresses the payload. As you note, it's more effective than just minifying...

> In FF I want to have these possibilities. It even shows the same directory structure as the core. Right, that wouldn't change under @Arlen22's proposal. It would be the...

> hmm, I think we would be good to go without the SJCL library, since the native web-crypto API is widely supported with latest browsers. ... I'm not 100% sure,...

> see: https://stuk.github.io/jszip/documentation/api_jszip.html Hi @pmario that's a great library (and is already integrated with TW as a plugin), but it does a lot more than what we need here, and...

Hi @pmario I quite like your argument in favour of moving JSZip into the core, but I don't know enough to refute the argument that increasing the entropy of the...

Hi @Arlen22 It sounds like you are thinking in terms of gzipping the entire store area. I interpreted your original request to be to do the gzipping at the plugin...

Thanks @linonetwo, and sorry to have missed this when you first posted it. I like the general idea here, but have a couple of thoughts: * We should use procedures...

Hi @linonetwo thank you for the updates. Thinking again, we do not need to introduce a new procedure here. I think we can overload the existing `` macro like this:...

> Very interesting approach, I've updated the definition and the doc. These features are even advanced for me, it is the first time for me to use them. Thank you...

> @Jermolene If code (wiki script) is OK, maybe we can merge them first, and let Doc improve in other PR. (If #7542 gets merge, I can work on auto...