Jeremy Ruston
Jeremy Ruston
> It would be possible to make the cheat-sheet a plugin. -- but users won't improve our plugins, they just complain that info is missing. Good suggestion! On reflection I...
> OK. Should I make it a core-plugin? Yes, but I'd be cautious about investing too much work without discussion. > With a more docs it would be possible to...
> What do you mean with "without discussion"? I mean that it might be worth having more discussion before trying to make a PR. > I would want to make...
Thanks @whjou @shadowforce62 I think it makes sense to close this for now.
> I have not forgotten about this issue. Actually, I created the PR, but when I saw that the "Content Type" dropdown was now populated with yet another esoteric type,...
> Today I think I can implement a "lazy-non-system-tiddlers", so only those tiddlers without macro def, don't have system tags, without "$:/" prefix will be lazied. > > What do...
> @rmunn I think we can close this issue. IMO we do not support IE anymore. @Jermolene ? Our position hasn't changed since [my earlier comment](https://github.com/Jermolene/TiddlyWiki5/issues/5192#issuecomment-738825340): > Our de facto...
Thanks for your patience @linonetwo. The problem with this implementation is that it duplicates a lot of the code concerned with tracking links and backlinks; essentially it's the same code...
> This is the new feature recently merged? I will take time to learn that. No, this is nothing to do with the parameterised transclusion work in #6666. I was...