Jeremy Ruston

> I do like @kookma 's version. Let's keep it simple. Just to be clear, you mean that we should restrict it to just HTML style comments? I'm not sure...

Slightly off-topic, but immediately after posting the above comment, I saw this tweet: > Today I learned that HTML comments are valid in JavaScript! 😱 But only as a single-line...

Thanks @rmunn > Just to chime in, I'd vastly prefer `//` comments over anything else. My reasoning is that filters feel like a programming language to me, and nearly every...

> @Jermolene ... Is there a way for the user to resolve the problem, without loosing data. .. If yes we should add a link to the docs, where we...

Thanks @joshuafontany I remain concerned that the `FileSystemAdaptor.prototype.displayError()` method is really a generic logging component, and so ideally should be implemented within the existing logger framework.

> @Jermolene ... I did create a new route, that lets us serve the test content from the tmp folder, relative to the editions/pluginlibrary folder. So it will be excluded...

Hi @pmario sorry for not thinking of it earlier, but I think it is confusing to call the edition "pluginlibrary". Perhaps "test-plugin-library" would be better?

> @Jermolene ... I did rename the edition to `test-pluginlibrary`. I did add a bit more text to the GettingStarted tiddler. Oh my apologies, I had completely forgotten that "pluginlibrary"...

Actually perhaps we should add a brief docs tiddler to the /dev edition called "How to run a local plugin library for testing".

Thanks @pmario