JeremyParish69

Should we change the entire staking section to look like this? `osmosisd q staking params` ``` bond_denom: uosmo historical_entries: 10000 max_entries: 7 max_validators: 118 min_commission_rate: "0.050000000000000000" min_self_delegation: "0" unbonding_time: 1209600s...

I don't see any response to this. Is there good reason for it? If so, I can prep the change...

There have been a number of attempts at a 'relayer registry', although I'm not sure if any has risen to become the canon. Including this here might introduce a lot...

Just saw this. Please see this proposed solution to add an asset type 'ics20' https://github.com/cosmos/chain-registry/pull/1538

Why is this an issue?

-There are checks that make sure the chain_name matches the directory it's in; that would have to be modified. -Any programmed assumptions that chain_name always == to the directory name...

> @JeremyParish69 I quite like the idea of doing `/{network_name}/_archive/`, but I'm not quite following the `passage_passage-1` bit - why not just maintain the `chain-id` as the folder name? >...

Can you please register the IBC connections for these connections with pryzmtestnet and add the traces for each of these assets

Missing requirements. Closing due to age/staleness. Can be reopened

This changes the file name, but not the reference(s) to it--which should be updated to be the same.