John S
John S
I assume you mean 3.9.3 and not 3.4.3? In any case, you definitely shouldn't mix code compiled with one version of Transcrypt with a runtime compiled from a different version....
Not sure, but I'll check it out and see if I can duplicate that behavior once I get a chance to rig up a test. I know I've run into...
It's been a while since I worked out this code, but yea the bit math can get messy with trying to make sure the right bits end up in the...
Will be added in v3.9.4
This is happening in [utils.py](https://github.com/TranscryptOrg/Transcrypt/blob/master/transcrypt/modules/org/transcrypt/utils.py) ``` match = pathPattern.search (line) if match: result.importedModuleNames.append (eval (match.group (1)) [2:-3]) ``` Still need to work out the reason for the slice in there.
It does seem to make sense to format the docstring in a way that is appropriate for the language. If it's not too messy to do that, it sounds like...
This is one I've had an eye on to tackle at some point sooner than later, so thanks for looking into it. I can't dig into it right at this...
Will be fixed in v3.9.4
Not yet, however 3.12 will likely be the target version for the next major update. Because Transcrypt is intimately tied to the Python AST for transpiling, the version of Python...
Will be fixed in v3.9.4 I know this was opened a long time ago, but thank you @phfaist for providing a clean example and fix. I also found an issue...