Joel Bennett

Is it worth pointing out that PowerShell already handles here strings as starting with just TWO characters? The third character is completely superflous (mandatory, but totally unnecessary). Try writing `$x...

It's hard for me to believe 2023 is almost over, and there's no comments in here... Is it _known_ already that `--interactive` does not work? ``` earthly debugger | failed...

If you mean build _in linux containers_ on Windows, you'll be fine. Use the native Windows' executable. The `--interactive` (or `-i`) switch still doesn't work in the "Native Windows" build,...

That's definitely how **I** prefer to see it handled: - Wrap on pipe (if the line's long enough to wrap) - Indent if you wrap on pipeline. I guess I'm...

But it's more than that. Parentheses are also blocking. Compare: ```PowerShell 1..100 | ForEach { start-sleep -m 100; $_ } ``` ```PowerShell (1..100 | ForEach { start-sleep -m 100; $_...

I would have said we had something like that, but I can't find it. I agree we should add something. What if we add "avoid using `;` to put multiple...

Yeah, "multiple statements on one line" is probably best.

So maybe what it should say is ... > IncludePrograms - When LocalOnly is specified, list packages > managed by chocolatey, and then also list all programs > in add-remove...

At what scope are we talking about parallelizing? I mean, what "things" would become parallel? Fixtures? Describe? It?

I agree with what's been said above: wrapping pester in parallelization would be easy, and I don't think I need in-process or even multi-core aware parallelization, but I do think...