Jake Urban

Maybe you're already accounting for this, but only stellar assets have trustlines (you don't need trustlines for custom tokens), so the check should be whether the user has added any...

Thanks @philipliu, its great to hear we can support onchain/onchain transactions without breaking changes to the SEP and Anchor Platform APIs. However, it does sound like clients would have to...

Also, I don't see the need for the `swap_only` config attribute. If USD SRT isn't supported, then `iso4217:USD` shouldn't be listed as an exchangeable asset for `stellar:SRT:G...` and vice versa.

@brunomuler @sdfcharles I'm not sure what this issue is asking for, can one of you provide more detail? Are there any changes to the design of the Send flow and...

The consensus is that we won't remove the account from the network, but we can remove it from Freighter. This may be branded as "hide" or "archive". If users want...

Looking at the implementation of `signAuthEntries()`, it appears as if we'll also need to update the function to support passing contract addresses. Right now it, as well as the stellar-base...

@leighmcculloch I'm curious on your take here -- we should be able to support auth entries that need signatures from signers of contracts right? The SDK doesn't need to know...

In short, if a contract (A) calls `require_auth()` on an `Address`, and that address is a contract (B), the host will call `B.__check_auth()` and pass it the authorization entries and...

Hey all, what is the status of this?

I'm in favor of turning it into an example in the repo. I do think updating `signAuthEntries()` and `authorizeEntry()` to support signatures from signers of contract accounts is in the...