Jacques Carette
Jacques Carette
Thanks. Is there an 'action item' for me at this point?
Note that it should be `Real`, not `Rational`. That seems to also be a hack. I agree that we need to change the declaration as a way to fix this....
1. that's a fine error message 2. it's output in a very unfriendly way So there's probably two things to fix here.
My expectation is that you will also propose a fix when you create the issue (or soon thereafter). If you are not in a position to propose a fix, then...
That is too naive a solution. The proper Drasil way to do this is to understand what "InputParameters" means as a concept, what scope it is used in, and then...
It's the correct direction. In more detail: - a lot of the information (about where the strings occur in the code itself) is too low-level to appear in the issue...
You need to differentiate between low-level details (it's a String) and higher-level conceptual interpretation (it's a name for a concept). The concept is that of "input parameters" (somewhat unsurprisingly). There...
And my reaction is the same. This particular one is even trickier, as I think that "get_input" actually ends up appearing in the generated code, so it is a rather...
To understand drasil-code (and drasil-gool), your best source of information will be Brooks' Master's Thesis, as well as our joint paper. They are both in the repo somewhere (I'm explicitly...
Just for the record: after discussion, yes, we need to add the concept "get_input" to `Choices` as a configuration parameter.