jabref icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
jabref copied to clipboard

Navigate between entries (Back/Forward button)

Open notuntoward opened this issue 5 years ago • 9 comments

After using JabRef 5 for a week, I'm really missing the forward/back buttons that were in JabRef 4.

Were these deleted on purpose? Can they be restored?

notuntoward avatar Apr 25 '20 19:04 notuntoward

I personally cannot remember, how they worked. Can you describe their functionality please?

calixtus avatar Apr 26 '20 16:04 calixtus

They were just like a web browser's back and forward buttons: you click the back button and you go to the entry you were at just before the one you are currently on. Click back again, and you go another step backwards in time. Forward does the opposite.

I used to use them constantly, for going back and forth between related papers, comparing ideas between them, or linking them together with comments.

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 9:17 AM Carl Christian Snethlage < [email protected]> wrote:

I personally cannot remember, how they worked. Can you describe their functionality please?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/JabRef/jabref/issues/6352#issuecomment-619578218, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA5MM4Y4WMNORU3NZV5B23DRORNCRANCNFSM4MQ37CWQ .

notuntoward avatar Apr 27 '20 04:04 notuntoward

You can still navigate using the arrow keys up/down

Siedlerchr avatar Apr 27 '20 17:04 Siedlerchr

@Siedlerchr The arrow keys don't navigate history, as far as I can tell.

For example, if the cursor is in the comment window, the arrow keys cause it scroll up or down a line; if the cursor is in the entry table, the arrow keys also only scroll up and down a line, but in the entry table.

@calixtus is this the kind of feeback you were looking for?

notuntoward avatar Apr 28 '20 02:04 notuntoward

This issue will be closed in 7 days due to inactivity :zzz: Please provide the requested information if the problem persists.

github-actions[bot] avatar Jun 10 '20 00:06 github-actions[bot]

Hey there, I'm getting a "stale status" warning, but I did provide the requested info. @Siedlerchr or @calixtus are you there?

notuntoward avatar Jun 10 '20 00:06 notuntoward

Hi @notuntoward , sorry for the delay. I really can't remember, that JabRef had this feature, but that does not mean, that it had not. However, i'm going to remove the stale and waiting label, so this issue won't be closed, but kept open for someone, who is interested in working on this. We keep this feature in mind, maybe put this on proposal for a small university project, but please accept my apology, that we mainly try to bugfix at the moment and to prepare JabRef for release of version 5.1.

calixtus avatar Jun 10 '20 23:06 calixtus

Thanks for the reply.

You can try out the back/forward buttons by installing JabRef 4.x, the latest of which is available here. I've reverted to 4.x because 5.x lacks these controls.

Below is a screenshot showing the back/forward buttons on the the 4.3.1 main menu. image

notuntoward avatar Jun 11 '20 02:06 notuntoward

This issue has been inactive for half a year. Since JabRef is constantly evolving this issue may not be relevant any longer and it will be closed in two weeks if no further activity occurs.

As part of an effort to ensure that the JabRef team is focusing on important and valid issues, we would like to ask if you could update the issue if it still persists. This could be in the following form:

  • If there has been a longer discussion, add a short summary of the most important points as a new comment (if not yet existing).
  • Provide further steps or information on how to reproduce this issue.
  • Upvote the initial post if you like to see it implemented soon. Votes are not the only metric that we use to determine the requests that are implemented, however, they do factor into our decision-making process.
  • If all information is provided and still up-to-date, then just add a short comment that the issue is still relevant.

Thank you for your contribution!

github-actions[bot] avatar Feb 28 '21 19:02 github-actions[bot]