JGSweets
JGSweets
@leos Interesting. I was not able to incur a failure in `py3.9` so it might be alteration in `py3.10+` However, if you want to try altering the `missing_module_function` inside that...
The CI is utilizing the parallelization flag for pytest. We could update the CI to not use the flag (investigate speed changes as a result). The failure is more of...
@leos I tested locally on `py3.10` as well and I was able to incur the error despite the fix I suggested. I'll have to investigate further to get to the...
#736 is a rework that should prevent this error in the future as now we don't modify the modules themselves.
Agreed, we should be consistent through and utilize the `Makefile`
In regards to testing, I think we should mimic the CI as well. We should also update the ghpages to show the same where different. However, we shouldn't restrict as...
To be able to achieve this I believe we need the workflow to have feature branches to deploy to pypi. E.g. master doesn't deploy, requires a branch to be `feature/...`...
@Michaelvll @concretevitamin do you have any suggestions for the concerns I raised? Thanks!
@Michaelvll @cblmemo I've updated the PR with the `ClusterName` refactor. Do we want to further refactor `provisioners`? If so, should we do it in this PR or a subsequent PR?
@Michaelvll Could you please re-review this PR? Thanks!