Why does RCP1.9 always fail to be solved in SSP2?
Hello, I have a question. Why does RCP1.9 always fail to be solved in SSP2? Increasing the number of model iterations and lowering the model accuracy have been tried
There are periods that model can't solve.
I wonder if you have solved this problem?
Hi @wangyingying1227, @Vapson, which model periods are not solving? In SSP/SPA2, carbon pricing does not begin until 2040, which would likely make it infeasible to then return to 1.9 W/m2 under SSP2 technology and GDP growth assumptions which in turn inform constraints on negative emissions deployment. This was our finding for a SSP2-1.9 scenario without direct air capture available from our recent paper (in the supplementary information):
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2db0/meta