Bring back comments in the Conway cddl spec
Please provide more comments explaining the semantics, and avoid magic constants
E.g. for https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger/blob/411054e40b4e08350049e4eaffdf0cc5f73e9d91/eras/conway/impl/cddl-files/conway.cddl#L20
The old explainer was very useful
One possible solution to this which would help better define the address is use the .abnfb control operator from: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9165.html to help define these kinds of fields.
@lehins missing details on vote constants in CDDL,
; no - 0 ; yes - 1 ; abstain - 2
@lehins missing details for thresholds in CDDL,
https://github.com/IntersectMBO/cardano-ledger/blob/7683b73971a800b36ca7317601552685fa0701ed/eras/conway/impl/cddl-files/conway.cddl#L304