Household members pairing UI component

[romaintailhurat]

A new kind of question type will be provided: a household members pairing component.

Type of question

🇫🇷 "Liens deux à deux" 🇬🇧 "Household members pairing"

Configuration

Parameters

Source variable

Source variable is a questionnaire variable input with completion, indicating the variable (vector) holding the list of househould members.

🇫🇷 "Variable source" 🇬🇧 "Source variable"

Loop

The link matrix is used to iterate over the links. To do so, the user will use the Loop feature of Pogues, with the "Based on" (:fr: "Basé sur") field selecting the matrix (by using the component name in Pogues). Filter can be applied using the "Excluding" (🇫🇷 "Sauf") field.

[romaintailhurat]

See also #600

[romaintailhurat]

Reviewed by @AnneHuSKa

[ORogel]

🇫🇷 Paramétrages possibles (à terme) :

• choix des deux axes (X et Y) -> dans un premier temps, uniquement un axe unique proposé au concepteur (X=Y)
• possibilité de filtrer ce qu'on veut pas comme croisement en utilisant les variable xAxis et yAxis(actuellement uniquement la diagonale) -> non proposé dans un premier temps au concepteur, mis en dur dans Pogues et passage dans le DDI (modélisation ?) ?
• la liste des options -> dans un premier temps, non proposé en option au concepteur et mis en dur dans Pogues et passage dans le DDI (modélisation ?) ?
• libellé de la question : à proposer par défaut ? modification possible ou champ grisé dans la question ?

Référence (modélisation Lunatic) : https://github.com/InseeFr/Lunatic/blob/v2-develop/src/stories/pairwise/links/links.json

🇬🇧 Possible settings (eventually) :

• choice of two axes (X and Y) -> initially, only one axis proposed to the designer (X=Y)
• possibility to filter what we don't want as a crossover by using the variables xAxis and yAxis (currently only the diagonal) -> not proposed at first to the designer, hardened in Pogues and passed to the DDI (modeling ?) ?
• the list of options -> at first, not proposed as an option to the designer and hard-coded in Pogues and passed to the DDI (modeling?) ?
• wording of the question : to be proposed by default ? possible modification or grayed field in the question ?

Reference (Lunatic modelisation) : https://github.com/InseeFr/Lunatic/blob/v2-develop/src/stories/pairwise/links/links.json

[romaintailhurat]

Next alpha release for validation won't include the reciprocity matrix (a change is needed in Lunatic in order to have a full transfo in Eno).