Iker

Linking these two here for reference: - [Paying Transaction Fees with the Asset Conversion Pallet using Polkadot-JS](https://github.com/bee344/asset-conversion-example/blob/main/polkadot-js/docs/README.md) - [Paying Transaction Fees with the Asset Conversion Pallet using Subxt](https://github.com/bee344/asset-conversion-example/blob/main/subxt/docs/README.md) They may...

I don't see any reason against doing this but there is a long backlog of bug fixes and feature requests around Polkadot.js Apps so this may not happen soon. Of...

With Asset hub and several other parachains live and running on Paseo testnet, we should consider adding support working on this issue soon.

We have concrete plan and dates to deprecate Rococo: https://forum.polkadot.network/t/rococo-to-be-deprecated-in-october/8702

As commented recently the _paraToBridge_ direction should be already supported in certain parachains on mainnet (f.e., moonbeam, mythos, astar and byfrost) since the call `transfer_assets_using_type_and_then` has been already enabled in...

@albertov19 @xlc is there any update around this? Note that the incoming 1.2.4 release will implement a [new interface from pallet XCM](https://github.com/polkadot-fellows/runtimes/pull/311) which will allow all the scenarios mentioned above...

is this behaviour consistent on your side? I have tried your workflow with Polkadot Relay Chain and other paras and I couldn't reproduce.

I believe that given the "multichain" capabilities of PAPI, it is the best suited (TS) library for this vision of a network-based SDK. However, given the discussion in https://github.com/polkadot-api/polkadot-api/issues/666 and...

I wish for https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/3546

@gllyst your PR doesn't seem to be just about a "note to README to clarify NEAR SDK usage". Consider closing this PR and creating a PR with the right changes.