Ihor Chulinda

@littledan could you please clarify how this summary will affect proposal and / or process?

> once you have all the "right" semantics @littledan what are the "right" semantics?

> What kinds of things do you all think you can learn from this sort of data? Are there any best practices that we should recommend to people who are...

@littledan, sorry I didn't realize that mentioning that proposal offends you. But it's not about that proposal at all. And I said that polls **MUST** be taken in coordination with...

> or pressure to demote stages I haven't proposed demoting at all, just delaying in some circumstances. If feedback is more negative (which is **VERY** rare situation) then something wen...

> I'd like to collect feedback before TC39 advances far in stages Oh, I didn't mentioned it in my proposal, but I was talking about article+polls in `stage 1`/`stage 2`...

Hm, I think that if both sides involved in research preparation it could be objective enough to reference it in further decision making process. But lets keep it aside for...

1. I thought that some kinda of established process, like I described above could be such guarantee, but probably it's too much? What are the boundaries for affect that community...

> * How do we convince people that their feedback is being used well, so that they will engage? One of possible arguments to convince the community is appearance of...

Obviously, this feature requires resolver(#64) to be implemented first.