Lukas M

**Original comment by Manh Nguyen Tien (Bitbucket: [manhnt9](https://bitbucket.org/manhnt9), GitHub: [manhnt9](https://github.com/manhnt9)).** ---------------------------------------- Someone has Ogre patches recently. Could you test it again?

**Original comment by Dennis Veatch (Bitbucket: [dveatch](https://bitbucket.org/dveatch), GitHub: [dveatch](https://github.com/dveatch)).** ---------------------------------------- Gota link to those patches?

**Original comment by Lukas Meindl (Bitbucket: [Ident8](https://bitbucket.org/Ident8), ).** ---------------------------------------- [https://bitbucket.org/cegui/cegui/pull-requests/?state=MERGED](https://bitbucket.org/cegui/cegui/pull-requests/?state=MERGED)

**Original comment by Lukas Meindl (Bitbucket: [Ident8](https://bitbucket.org/Ident8), ).** ---------------------------------------- In this context we might also start implementing the Facade pattern instead of managers, wherever easily possible ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/249581/explain-facade-pattern-with-c-example )

**Original comment by Lukas Meindl (Bitbucket: [Ident8](https://bitbucket.org/Ident8), ).** ---------------------------------------- There was at least one rejected patch related to singletons in the past, maybe useful information can be extracted from there....

**Original comment by Manh Nguyen Tien (Bitbucket: [manhnt9](https://bitbucket.org/manhnt9), GitHub: [manhnt9](https://github.com/manhnt9)).** ---------------------------------------- What are problems with Singletons that we need to replace them?

**Original comment by Lukas Meindl (Bitbucket: [Ident8](https://bitbucket.org/Ident8), ).** ---------------------------------------- @zer0-x it is just lazy/bad design imo. Imo, it is never good to expose something publically unless absolutely necessary. In specific...

**Original comment by Martin Preisler (Bitbucket: [mpreisler](https://bitbucket.org/mpreisler), GitHub: [mpreisler](https://github.com/mpreisler)).** ---------------------------------------- You are right. This looks like a bug. LayoutContainers take the reference size from their parent. If their parent is...

**Original comment by Jan Drabner (Bitbucket: [TheSHEEEP](https://bitbucket.org/TheSHEEEP), GitHub: [TheSHEEEP](https://github.com/TheSHEEEP)).** ---------------------------------------- I noticed another problem: When the LayoutContainer has a position, let's say 0.1/0.1 (relative), then its children ignore that position...

**Original comment by Manh Nguyen Tien (Bitbucket: [manhnt9](https://bitbucket.org/manhnt9), GitHub: [manhnt9](https://github.com/manhnt9)).** ---------------------------------------- I asked this on IRC but so far had no replies so I'm pasting it here. Hi, any ideas...