What do these changes do?

Related issue/s

How to test

Dev-ops

Nov 18 '25 07:11 sanderegg

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for 58cee3be.

✅ Passed Jobs With Interesting Signals

Pipeline	Job	Signal	Health on `master`	Retries	🔍 CI Insights	📄 Logs
`CI`	`integration-tests`	Base branch is broken, but the job passed. Looks like this might be a real fix 💪		`0`	View	View
`CI`	`unit-tests`	Base branch is broken, but the job passed. Looks like this might be a real fix 💪		`0`	View	View

Nov 18 '25 07:11 mergify[bot]

Codecov Report

:white_check_mark: All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 87.52%. Comparing base (daf0b87) to head (58cee3b). :warning: Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8605   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.51%   87.52%           
=======================================
  Files        2010     2006    -4     
  Lines       78979    78895   -84     
  Branches     1378     1378           
=======================================
- Hits        69122    69053   -69     
+ Misses       9453     9438   -15     
  Partials      404      404

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	`63.88% <ø> (-0.07%)`	:arrow_down:
unittests	`86.36% <ø> (+0.01%)`	:arrow_up:

Components	Coverage Δ
pkg_aws_library	`95.30% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_celery_library	`83.43% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_dask_task_models_library	`79.37% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_models_library	`92.83% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_notifications_library	`85.20% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_postgres_database	`88.03% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_service_integration	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_service_library	`71.30% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_settings_library	`90.21% <ø> (ø)`
pkg_simcore_sdk	`84.58% <ø> (ø)`
agent	`93.44% <ø> (ø)`
api_server	`91.37% <ø> (ø)`
autoscaling	`95.83% <ø> (ø)`
catalog	`92.06% <ø> (ø)`
clusters_keeper	`99.14% <ø> (ø)`
dask_sidecar	`91.72% <ø> (ø)`
datcore_adapter	`97.95% <ø> (ø)`
director	`75.72% <ø> (ø)`
director_v2	`91.21% <ø> (-0.09%)`	:arrow_down:
dynamic_scheduler	`96.66% <ø> (ø)`
dynamic_sidecar	`90.72% <ø> (-0.11%)`	:arrow_down:
efs_guardian	`89.83% <ø> (ø)`
invitations	`90.90% <ø> (ø)`
payments	`92.70% <ø> (ø)`
resource_usage_tracker	`92.27% <ø> (+0.26%)`	:arrow_up:
storage	`86.62% <ø> (+0.16%)`	:arrow_up:
webclient	`∅ <ø> (∅)`
webserver	`86.69% <ø> (+0.03%)`	:arrow_up:

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update daf0b87...58cee3b. Read the comment docs.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

:package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Nov 18 '25 09:11 codecov[bot]

@mergify queue

Nov 18 '25 18:11 sanderegg

queue

🛑 Configuration not compatible with a branch protection setting

The branch protection setting Require branches to be up to date before merging is not compatible with draft PR checks. To keep this branch protection enabled, update your Mergify configuration to enable in-place checks: set merge_queue.max_parallel_checks: 1, set every queue rule batch_size: 1, and avoid two-step CI (make merge_conditions identical to queue_conditions). Otherwise, disable this branch protection.

Nov 18 '25 18:11 mergify[bot]

I'll need to consider the traefik upgrade briefly before approving, that could break things, jfyi