IT-VBFK

`FluentAssertionProvider` 🤔

Or rename it to something specific to this lib (which is weird if someone else uses it)? Like `IFluentAssertionsStopwatch`

What about the negative of `HaveCount`?

What OS runs on the remote desktop? Can you please verify following: 1) clone this repo 2) run `./build.sh` (for unix) or `.\build.ps1` (for windows) and check if all tests...

Ok. I thought something related to #2368

Hmm.. discovered a bad bug... Will fix it in the evening 🫣

I assume that should be only possible for `Excluding()`, `.For().Exclude()` and `Including()` and nothing else? Asking, because strictly speaking e.g. `subject.Should().BeEquivalentTo(expected, opt => opt.WithStrictOrderingFor(o => new { o.prop1, o.prop2 }));`...

Huh.. that's true Will also add this to a few missing options

Ok, I converted it to a draft. But I leave it open. Take it as a sketch 😉

There is an open change request from Dennis, to exclude TFMs: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/QD-7401/Allow-excluding-or-including-certain-.NET-framework-targets FYI: this happens, because we do not test .netstandard2.0+ anymore (since we dropped direct support for .netcore2.x and...