dosdp-tools
dosdp-tools copied to clipboard
INCATools
Support contributors field
Only once the pull request has been merged.
Based on discussion on pull request, this is still TBD:
- Specify ORCIDs (Seems reasonable to me)
- If we do specify ORCIDs do we specify a full IRI or Curie, or both?
- Recommend that if translated to OWL, the result should be a list of dc:contributor annotations on the term. (I think this is a no brainer.)
Currently we just suggest ORCIDs:
description: A list of authors of a pattern. We recommend that each author is specified using an ORCID (full URL). We do not recommend that this list is instantiated in terms generated using a pattern.
Making this mandatory & specifying how will allow us to add checks. OTOH - this is meant to be a very general spec that anyone could use for OWL patterns, so may be better to allow for some flexibility.
I think validation should be just URI. This is good linked data standard and people can add orcid or whatever else they want to identify themselves.
A CURIE should be fine as long as the prefix expansion is provided in the usual way.
@matentzn dosdp-tools won't care about unknown keys, so you can add before dosdp-tools supports it.
I saw this comment in the schema:
We do not recommend that this list is instantiated in terms generated using a pattern, but where it is it should be instantiated as a set of annotation axioms using dc:contributor.
Does this mean there is no action needed in dosdp-tools in terms of generating axioms?
The only thing i can think of is during the compilation of pattern.owl using this dosdp prototype tool. There I would like the dc:contributor tags! Not, for sure, on the compiled instances (think filesize)!