Maintain registry of DPs for different ontologies

[cmungall]

Ontology Patterns

Currently this ticket is the primary source for this registry. Note that some implementations are experimental, and may not fully conform yet. Where no DPs exist, instead we can cross-link github tickets.

Tick box when patterns are considered 'done'

• [ ] uberon https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/tree/master/patterns @cmungall
• [ ] cl https://github.com/obophenotype/cell-ontology/issues/450
• [ ] to https://github.com/Planteome/plant-trait-ontology/tree/add-dp/patterns @marieALaporte
• [ ] agro https://github.com/AgriculturalSemantics/agro/issues/15 @marieALaporte
• [ ] plant stress and disease ontology https://github.com/austinmeier/ontology-of-plant-stress @austinmeier
• [ ] envo https://github.com/EnvironmentOntology/envo/tree/master/src/envo/patterns @pbuttigieg
• [ ] oba https://github.com/obophenotype/bio-attribute-ontology/tree/master/src/ontology/patterns @cmungall
• [ ] hpo https://github.com/obophenotype/human-phenotype-ontology/tree/master/src/patterns @drseb
• [ ] go https://github.com/geneontology/design_patterns @dosumis
• [ ] ecto (note this is different from ENVO...) https://github.com/cmungall/environmental-conditions/tree/master/src/patterns @cmungall and @balhoff

[dosumis]

Recipe for checking a registry with Travis:

1. Run JSON schema check, pulling schema docs from DOS-DP site. See DOS-DP .travis.yml & schema test script for setup.

2. Additional checks: (a) Additional syntactic checks: Code TBA: - simple Python checks should be sufficient. (b) OWL checks: Via API or layer over OWLtools?

[cmungall]

update on phenotypes, we're making this more central: https://github.com/obophenotype/upheno/pull/215