[ACT] SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name - Failed Examples (fail vs inapplicable)

[philljenkins]

Investigate rule differences between ACT fail case and Checker reporting inapplicable for the following:

SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name

Failed Example 1 fail vs inapplicable - HAAC_Aria_SvgAlt:Pass_0,Fail_2

Failed Example 2 fail vs inapplicable - HAAC_Aria_SvgAlt:Pass_0,Fail_2

Failed Example 3 fail vs inapplicable - HAAC_Aria_ImgAlt:Pass_0,Fail_2

Failed Example 4 fail vs inapplicable - HAAC_Aria_SvgAlt:Pass_0,Fail_2

Make recommendation:

[ ] Either fix Checker rue, or make recommendation to fix ACT rule and/or testcase [ ] Open issue

Background:

The comparison analysis is documented in a spreadsheet here: See Checker_ACT_Mapping 2022-06-23.xlsx (see column H cells highlighted in yellow for which Checker rules need changing)

Also see the Checker Implementation Report which documents the rules run against the ACT test cases. Equal Access Accessibility Checker version 3.1.33-rc, test results were last updated 7 July 2022. https://wai-wcag-act-rules.netlify.app/standards-guidelines/act/implementations/equal-access/

[aliunwala]

Triage:

Since this is a dual rule a fail+inapplicable -> fail. So this one looks consistent. So this might be done @philljenkins will take another look.

[tombrunet]

I think this is just a close.

[tombrunet]

This is showing as consistent now. Closing.