[ACT] HTML page lang and xml:lang attributes have matching values- Inapplicable Examples (untested and passed vs inapplicable)

[philljenkins]

Investigate rule differences between ACT fail case and Checker reporting passing and/or inapplicable for the following:

HTML page lang and xml:lang attributes have matching values

Inapplicable Example 1 untested - WCAG20_Html_HasLang:Pass_0,Fail_4,Fail_5

Inapplicable Example 2 untested - WCAG20_Html_HasLang:Pass_0,Fail_4,Fail_5

Inapplicable Example 3 untested - WCAG20_Html_HasLang:Pass_0,Fail_4,Fail_5

Inapplicable Example 5 passed - WCAG20_Html_HasLang:Pass_0,Fail_4,Fail_5

Inapplicable Example 6 passed - WCAG20_Html_HasLang:Pass_0,Fail_4,Fail_5

Inapplicable Example 7 passed - WCAG20_Html_HasLang:Pass_0,Fail_4,Fail_5

Make recommendation:

[ ] Either fix Checker rue, or make recommendation to fix ACT rule and/or testcase [ ] Open issue

Background:

The comparison analysis is documented in a spreadsheet here: See Checker_ACT_Mapping 2022-06-23.xlsx (see column H cells highlighted in yellow for which Checker rules need changing)

Also see the Checker Implementation Report which documents the rules run against the ACT test cases. Equal Access Accessibility Checker version 3.1.33-rc, test results were last updated 7 July 2022. https://wai-wcag-act-rules.netlify.app/standards-guidelines/act/implementations/equal-access/

[tombrunet]

Same as #1022. Checking with Wilco on the handling of non-HTML files.

[tombrunet]

Shows as consistent now. Closing.