Hookyns
Types are being overwrritten across files in inline mode
_ßr.Type.store.set( calls in different files are overwriting each other when they have the same id.
Suggestion: I think the singleton behavior is good. It means I can access all the types of the library using Type.store. I think they just need unique IDs.
https://gist.github.com/avin-kavish/a28e22c62275a63d1788624173d820fc
Search for _ßr.Type.store.set(1729 in these two files.
Whole typelib mode is weird in current version. Do you need that mode now?
next version will be based on one standard shared static storage, ttly reworked.
Sorry I mean inline mode. That’s the problem.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 at 16:38, Roman Jámbor @.***> wrote:
Whole typelib mode is weird in current version. Do you need that mode now?
next version will be based on one standard shared static storage, ttly reworked.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hookyns/tst-reflect/issues/64#issuecomment-1228362401, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALRQ7U5VQX2JDPPCFVWMDYTV3CQUPANCNFSM57VQ7CDA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Is that result of single build? Isn't it result of some hot reload or something? Or do you use incremental build?
wow, 2k lines of metadata, seems like u rly use the reflection. 😊
You'll like the next version, cuz it generates 90% less code in some cases.
Single build. Yeah I mean my project is at about 40k LOC now. It’s only gonna get bigger :) it’s similar to asp net core in architecture
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 at 19:23, Roman Jámbor @.***> wrote:
Is that result of single build? Isn't it result of some hot reload or something? Or do you use incremental build?
wow, 2k lines of metadata, seems like u rly use the reflection. 😊
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hookyns/tst-reflect/issues/64#issuecomment-1228519493, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALRQ7U7VAMOLPHXK5V527HDV3DD6TANCNFSM57VQ7CDA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Something like I build.. 😄 https://github.com/Hookyns/NetLeaf
But I create general .NET host framework.
I plan to integrate hyper-express with ASP.NET like wrapper, but it will not happen anytime soon.
It’s similar but not exactly. In fact the apis are lot different. they are more express like. Also djangolike.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 at 19:38, Roman Jámbor @.***> wrote:
Something like I build.. 😄 https://github.com/Hookyns/NetLeaf
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hookyns/tst-reflect/issues/64#issuecomment-1228536404, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALRQ7U2BSBFXXZ7ZDVFFTO3V3DFVBANCNFSM57VQ7CDA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Can I clone the repo to debug it? It's not possible that two types has the same ID; it is generated by TypeScript so it meant that TypeScript itself has duplicit type ids and I don't know why. That conflict is with enum item so maybe it is some special case...
Yeah, I’ll add you when I get home.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 at 20:23, Roman Jámbor @.***> wrote:
Can I clone the repo to debug it? It's not possible that two types has the same ID; it is generated by TypeScript so it meant that TypeScript itself has duplicit type ids and I don't know why. That conflict is with enum item so maybe it is some special case...
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hookyns/tst-reflect/issues/64#issuecomment-1228595181, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALRQ7UYMEL2C7XDWMNTTUG3V3DK5DANCNFSM57VQ7CDA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Btw once it conflicted against array iterator built in type
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 at 20:30, Avin Abeyratne @.***> wrote:
Yeah, I’ll add you when I get home.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 at 20:23, Roman Jámbor @.***> wrote:
Can I clone the repo to debug it? It's not possible that two types has the same ID; it is generated by TypeScript so it meant that TypeScript itself has duplicit type ids and I don't know why. That conflict is with enum item so maybe it is some special case...
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hookyns/tst-reflect/issues/64#issuecomment-1228595181, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALRQ7UYMEL2C7XDWMNTTUG3V3DK5DANCNFSM57VQ7CDA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>