dropSeqPipe
dropSeqPipe copied to clipboard
help undestanding output
Hi dropseqpipers,
I have downsampled some single cell data to test for the quality of the results using the same number of reads per cell. I have given each of my 100 cells 10,000 reads in the fastq files.
After analysis I see that only have about ~3000 reads per cell that are used for the anlysis and I am trying to diagnose where the reads might have been filtered out. One possibility is that cutadapt is filtering reads for not having the correct structure, or perhaps too much adapter or similar.
Here is the cutadapt multiqc file:
Sample r_processed r_with_adapters bp_processed quality_trimmed bp_written percent_trimmed
sample1_R2 950971 584570 118871375 12147260 77382403 34.90240774955283
sample2_R2 1058522 655457 132315250 12524937 90626084 31.507453600397533
sample3_R2 929245 557125 116155625 8035848 74496049 35.865310870653055
sample4_R2 958210 563527 119776250 9272229 83291408 30.46083175921771
I'm not very familiar with the output of cutadapt. Does the above indicate that there are many reads that are being filtered out?
Hey @RichardCorbett
I would rather see the log file we create that is called clean_qc
or even better, the yield plot if you got it.
Thanks @Hoohm,
I don't seem to have either of those:
find . ./samples ./samples/sample1 ./samples/sample1/top_barcodes.csv ./samples/sample1/barcodes.csv ./samples/sample1/trimmed_repaired_R1.fastq.gz ./samples/sample1/trimmed_repaired_R2.fastq.gz ./samples/sample1/empty_barcode_mapping.pkl ./samples/sample1/barcode_ref.pkl ./samples/sample1/barcode_ext_ref.pkl ./samples/sample1/Log.final.out ./samples/sample1/Log.out ./samples/sample1/_STARtmp find:
./samples/sample1/_STARtmp': Permission denied
./samples/sample1/Log.progress.out
./samples/sample1/read
./samples/sample1/read/barcodes.tsv
./samples/sample1/read/genes.tsv
./samples/sample1/read/matrix.mtx
./samples/sample1/barcode_mapping_counts.pkl
./samples/sample1/SJ.out.tab
./samples/sample1/Unmapped.out.mate1.gz
./samples/sample1/final.bam
./samples/sample1/umi
./samples/sample1/umi/expression.long
./samples/sample1/umi/barcodes.tsv
./samples/sample1/umi/genes.tsv
./samples/sample1/umi/matrix.mtx
./logs
./logs/cutadapt
./logs/cutadapt/sample1_R2.qc.txt
./logs/cutadapt/sample1_R1.qc.txt
./logs/cutadapt/sample1.clean_qc.csv
./logs/fastqc
./logs/fastqc/sample1_R1_fastqc.html
./logs/fastqc/sample1_R1_fastqc.zip
./logs/fastqc/sample1_R2_fastqc.html
./logs/fastqc/sample1_R2_fastqc.zip
./logs/bbmap
./logs/bbmap/sample1_repair.txt
./logs/dropseq_tools
./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_beadSubstitutionSummary.txt
./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_beadSubstitutionReport.txt
./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_synthesis_stats_summary.txt
./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_hist_out_cell.txt
./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_rna_metrics.txt
./reports
./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data
./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_sources.txt
./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_data.json
./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt
./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_fastqc.txt
./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc.log
./reports/fastqc_reads_data
./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_sources.txt
./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_data.json
./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt
./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_fastqc.txt
./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc.log
./reports/fastqc_barcodes.html
./reports/fastqc_reads.html
./reports/RNA_filtering_data
./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_sources.txt
./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_data.json
./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_cutadapt.txt
./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt
./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc.log
./reports/RNA_filtering.html
./reports/barcode_filtering_data
./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_sources.txt
./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_data.json
./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_cutadapt.txt
./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt
./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc.log
./reports/barcode_filtering.html
./reports/star_data
./reports/star_data/multiqc_sources.txt
./reports/star_data/multiqc_star.txt
./reports/star_data/multiqc_data.json
./reports/star_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt
./reports/star_data/multiqc.log
./reports/star.html
./plots
./plots/rna_metrics
./plots/knee_plots
./plots/knee_plots/sample1_knee_plot.pdf
./summary
./summary/read
./summary/read/barcodes.tsv
./summary/read/genes.tsv
./summary/read/matrix.mtx
./summary/umi
./summary/umi/barcodes.tsv
./summary/umi/genes.tsv
./summary/umi/matrix.mtx
`
This is the one /logs/cutadapt/sample1.clean_qc.csv What about the plots folder?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:16 PM Richard Corbett [email protected] wrote:
Thanks @Hoohm https://github.com/Hoohm,
I don't seem to have either of those:
find . ./samples ./samples/sample1 ./samples/sample1/top_barcodes.csv ./samples/sample1/barcodes.csv ./samples/sample1/trimmed_repaired_R1.fastq.gz ./samples/sample1/trimmed_repaired_R2.fastq.gz ./samples/sample1/empty_barcode_mapping.pkl ./samples/sample1/barcode_ref.pkl ./samples/sample1/barcode_ext_ref.pkl ./samples/sample1/Log.final.out ./samples/sample1/Log.out ./samples/sample1/_STARtmp find: ./samples/sample1/_STARtmp': Permission denied ./samples/sample1/Log.progress.out ./samples/sample1/read ./samples/sample1/read/barcodes.tsv ./samples/sample1/read/genes.tsv ./samples/sample1/read/matrix.mtx ./samples/sample1/barcode_mapping_counts.pkl ./samples/sample1/SJ.out.tab ./samples/sample1/Unmapped.out.mate1.gz ./samples/sample1/final.bam ./samples/sample1/umi ./samples/sample1/umi/expression.long ./samples/sample1/umi/barcodes.tsv ./samples/sample1/umi/genes.tsv ./samples/sample1/umi/matrix.mtx ./logs ./logs/cutadapt ./logs/cutadapt/sample1_R2.qc.txt ./logs/cutadapt/sample1_R1.qc.txt ./logs/cutadapt/sample1.clean_qc.csv ./logs/fastqc ./logs/fastqc/sample1_R1_fastqc.html ./logs/fastqc/sample1_R1_fastqc.zip ./logs/fastqc/sample1_R2_fastqc.html ./logs/fastqc/sample1_R2_fastqc.zip ./logs/bbmap ./logs/bbmap/sample1_repair.txt ./logs/dropseq_tools ./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_beadSubstitutionSummary.txt ./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_beadSubstitutionReport.txt ./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_synthesis_stats_summary.txt ./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_hist_out_cell.txt ./logs/dropseq_tools/sample1_rna_metrics.txt ./reports ./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data ./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_sources.txt ./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_data.json ./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt ./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc_fastqc.txt ./reports/fastqc_barcodes_data/multiqc.log ./reports/fastqc_reads_data ./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_sources.txt ./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_data.json ./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt ./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc_fastqc.txt ./reports/fastqc_reads_data/multiqc.log ./reports/fastqc_barcodes.html ./reports/fastqc_reads.html ./reports/RNA_filtering_data ./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_sources.txt ./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_data.json ./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_cutadapt.txt ./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt ./reports/RNA_filtering_data/multiqc.log ./reports/RNA_filtering.html ./reports/barcode_filtering_data ./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_sources.txt ./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_data.json ./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_cutadapt.txt ./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt ./reports/barcode_filtering_data/multiqc.log ./reports/barcode_filtering.html ./reports/star_data ./reports/star_data/multiqc_sources.txt ./reports/star_data/multiqc_star.txt ./reports/star_data/multiqc_data.json ./reports/star_data/multiqc_general_stats.txt ./reports/star_data/multiqc.log ./reports/star.html ./plots ./plots/rna_metrics ./plots/knee_plots ./plots/knee_plots/sample1_knee_plot.pdf ./summary ./summary/read ./summary/read/barcodes.tsv ./summary/read/genes.tsv ./summary/read/matrix.mtx ./summary/umi ./summary/umi/barcodes.tsv ./summary/umi/genes.tsv ./summary/umi/matrix.mtx `
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hoohm/dropSeqPipe/issues/103#issuecomment-607276186, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJVO2A4J4JKBWIGIZGK3Q3RKNEELANCNFSM4LYGPNSQ .
--
Roelli Patrick Division of Animal Physiology and Immunology TUM School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan Technische Universität München Weihenstephaner Berg 3 85354 Freising GermanyBCF, Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsBâtiment Génopode, Quartier SorgeUniversity of Lausanne1015 LausanneSwitzerland
https://github.com/Hoohm https://github.com/Hoohm
The plots folder is there, I think that some plots failed, perhaps due to an R library problem on the server. I do have the plots for the same data pre-downsampled (ie. not just 100 cells at 10K reads, but all the data for all the cells:
clean_qc file:
Adapter,Sequence,Pair,Count Illumina_Universal,AGATCGGAAGAG,R1,5 PrefixNX/1,AGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG,R1,0 Trans1,TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG,R1,0 Trans1_rc,CTGTCTCTTATACACATCTGACGCTGCCGACGA,R1,697 Trans2,GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG,R1,0 Trans2_rc,CTGTCTCTTATACACATCTCCGAGCCCACGAGAC,R1,62525 polyA,AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA,R1,6129 polyT,TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT,R1,780065 polyC,CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC,R1,5133 polyG,GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG,R1,434 drop-seq,GTACTCTGCGTTGATACCACTGCTTCCGCGGACAGGC,R1,0 Nextera,CTGTCTCTTATACACATCT,R1,104 Illumina_Universal,AGATCGGAAGAG,R2,843 PrefixNX/1,AGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG,R2,627 Trans1,TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG,R2,44 Trans1_rc,CTGTCTCTTATACACATCTGACGCTGCCGACGA,R2,815 Trans2,GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG,R2,31 Trans2_rc,CTGTCTCTTATACACATCTCCGAGCCCACGAGAC,R2,25 polyA,AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA,R2,505027 polyT,TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT,R2,2125 polyC,CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC,R2,7866 polyG,GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG,R2,3347 drop-seq,GTACTCTGCGTTGATACCACTGCTTCCGCGGACAGGC,R2,63726 Nextera,CTGTCTCTTATACACATCT,R2,94
thanks!
Hi @Hoohm, Do the plot or data above help you understand how we're only seeing about 3500 reads per cell in our read-based matrix.mtx file? If I understand the plot correctly I expected to see about twice the number that we're seeing. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
The best plot to help would be the yield plot, but for some reason it crashed. What about the star multiqc report?
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, 20:27 Richard Corbett, [email protected] wrote:
Hi @Hoohm https://github.com/Hoohm, Do the plot or data above help you understand how we're only seeing about 3500 reads per cell in our read-based matrix.mtx file? If I understand the plot correctly I expected to see about twice the number that we're seeing. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hoohm/dropSeqPipe/issues/103#issuecomment-608592913, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJVO2GXOHI5ZNV7SBQKU4DRKYTBLANCNFSM4LYGPNSQ .
Star results...
When you say 3000 reads, to mean that's the total for each cell? 3000 reads or umi?
On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, 23:10 Richard Corbett, [email protected] wrote:
Star results... [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9285915/78404934-5347d100-75b4-11ea-9678-a71fe39f6d26.png
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/Hoohm/dropSeqPipe/issues/103#issuecomment-608667744, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJVO2F6ZEHJ4M7DTIB2BT3RKZGD7ANCNFSM4LYGPNSQ .
The 3000 is the total reads per cell. I also have the UMI counts which average down around 1000 counts per cell.
From the cleanqc I see that around 800'000 of your R1 has been trimmed, that means your left with around 200'000 reads after trimming. From there, you loose around 20% so you end up with 150'000 so, assuming similar distribution of your data for all the cells, this would be around 1500 reads per cell.
Great. Would it be correct to interpret this as the reads have lots of polyA/T included that don't contain enough 3' RNA to be useful?
I just heard that our libraries for this test were 100-150bp shorter than intended which seems to be concordant with the interpretation that many of our read pairs did not contain significant mRNA signal adjacent to the polyA sequence as shown by these lines from the clean_qc file:
polyT,TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT,R1,780065 polyA,AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA,R2,505027
Does this seem to make sense to you?
thanks RIchard
Yes, seems to be inline with my interpretation.