archivemount-ng 1a (new formula)

[cho-m]

Not sure yet if this should be a new formula or be used as new upstream for archivemount.

Created by current Debian maintainer of archivemount so Debian/Ubuntu provides it https://packages.debian.org/source/trixie/archivemount

According to Repology https://repology.org/project/fusefs%3Aarchivemount/versions, MacPorts and NixOS accepted it too. So may meet our distribution policy for replacing name.

Though cannot meet "official successor" status due to death of original author: https://github.com/cybernoid/archivemount/issues/29

---

If new formula, will most likely deprecate archivemount perhaps with replacement recommendation.

So question of whether we want to automatically upgrade all users or just alert users of a replacement option.

[fxcoudert]

I would support using it as new upstream for the formula, to avoid duplication and confusion. This seems the most useful way forward for our users.

[gromgit]

As the maintainer of the macOS formula, I'm personally inclined to "deprecate and recommend replacement" rather than quietly replace the now-defunct formula. That said, I'll follow Homebrew's lead on this, to avoid confusion.

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

[daeho-ro]

If there is some dependent for archivemount and if homebrew plan to change it to archivemount-ng, then the replacement and upstream change is not differ, so I prefer the upstream change. But in this case, I haven't found any dependent and only users are affected then I prefer to use the replacement.

[gromgit]

Is there a consensus on how to proceed with this?

[github-actions[bot]]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.