Hideaki Imamura

Let me confirm that the current situation of this PR. Is this ready for review, or do we need to decide something?

We should add a document for this in this issue. Making the `constant_liar` option available in the multi-objective optimization is a future work.

Ops. Really? @contramundum53 Do you have any opinions this?

We have been discussing solutions to this issue. Due to the different policies and disagreements that have emerged from the discussion, it is difficult to fix this issue before V3...

It would be nice for discussion if anyone send a PR.

Thanks for raising an issue. Currently, we have no resource to consider and add new sampler, but it would be great to submit a PR to implement that. I will...

@keisuke-umezawa Thanks for the suggestion. For now, this issue is labeled V3 because it may be tackled within V3. The current plan is to remove the V3 label from this...

Since there was no particular community input on this item, we will not be working on this item, at least not in V3.

Thanks for the PR. I think this PR is good to reduce the complexity of TPESampler. Could you fix the CI errors?

Let me remove the v3 label since this is out-of-scope of v3.