Juho Saarinen
Juho Saarinen
@mutahhir @ansgarm any thoughts on this?
This should be non-breaking change (as all logic should be behind the flag), but still might be good if others review this, too.
There is currently community made component for this (https://github.com/nikovirtala/projen-vitest). In codebases that I have worked with vitest has made test running a lot faster, so it might benefit also Projen's...
Hopefully #152 gets merged and images published as earlier ones from this repo. Otherwise it seems that forking would be only option if needing functionality that this repo's code offers.