Joel Mitchell

Not yet I'm afraid, not that's documented anyway. The settings functionality needs reworking and will be changed at some point in the next few releases to make it extensible in...

This functionality related to the idea of having singular custom entities e.g. having a "Menu" custom entity that will only ever have one entry. This is similar to the way...

> you cannot easily rollback a change to an in-memory cache Actually, this feature is more to do with co-ordinating multiple commands. If I have two commands that I run...

Lots to reply to here... > I would rather have the scope auto-completing as long as no exception is thrown Our behavior mimics the behavior of [System.Transactions.TransactionScope](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.transactions.transactionscope?view=net-5.0) to be consistent...

+1 for this in separate feedback: > I'm wondering is it's possible to have user settings for page modules or custom entities. By user settings, I mean settings that a...

It is not possible at this time to use a different database such as postgres with Cofoundry. Although much of the data access uses EF Core, we use raw scripts...

@OneOfBestMan please see my comments above. Postgres is not supported and not currently scheduled for development. Additional feedback for an open source RDBMS with a preference for postgres [on this...

Thanks for the suggestion @vector-man The feedback I'm seeing is that postgres in particular is a popular requirement. I'm keen to get it working, but aside from doing the work...

There's no progress to report. Last year was tough having lost funding, but things are picking up again. SQLServer isn't yet a problem for our clients so other features have...

There's no concurrency protection built in yet unfortunately. It's a fairly big feature to add and resolving conflicts can be tricky, but as you say, it could be as simple...