[FEATURE] Remove dependency on kernel module

[gruyaume]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Building and installing PacketRusher currently relies on building and loading a kernel module. This makes PacketRusher difficult to package and distribute (ex. as a container image or a snap) and limits its potential usability.

Describe the behavior you'd like Ability to distribute PacketRusher as a container image and/or snap.

Potential alternatives to kernel modules

• eBPF: Implementing the packet processing logic using eBPF could offer the same performance (kernel level packet decisions) and improving portability

[linouxis9]

Hi @gruyaume,

Thanks a lot for opening this ticket! Indeed, this is a big issue!

There are a few workarounds:

• As you mentioned, using eBPF, I have a WIP PR here but it's far from done: https://github.com/HewlettPackard/PacketRusher/pull/47 I think Free5GC might be working on that for their UPF too. I'm looking forward integrating it if they ever do release it!
• Install the kernel module on the k8s workers (tested and working, it's especially great if you use Free5GC's UPF as you have to install for their UPF anyway)
• Integrate back go-gtp inside PacketRusher, not too hard, but performance will be limited.
• It's currently possible to use PacketRusher without the kernel module if you want to only use it for it's control plane testing features as well.

Hope it helps!

Cheers, Valentin

[gruyaume]

Thank you @linouxis9 for the quick response and acknowledging this issue.

We would be interested in using PacketRusher to assess performance of Charmed Aether SD-Core, and ability to package and distribute it is a pre-requisite.

I will follow the progress on this issue.