HenrikJoreteg
Give this a better name
"hjs-webpack" is boring and dull.
a few of my silly ideas (these things that are available on npm)
easier shades carefree helpy helperton boat simpleton robut minion
what do you think @lukekarrys?
other ideas:
roar snore mindless mundane
kinda liking: stationary (as in static)
I like several of these suggested. My only feedback would be not to use a name that infers you may have re-written or forked webpack (easy-webpack). It would be nice to somehow relate that this is a super simple config mechanism for webpack.
@henrikjoreteg I like that :+1:
Luke Karrys
On Jul 25, 2015, at 9:25 PM, Henrik Joreteg [email protected] wrote:
suitcase possibly
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
briefcase could be a nice pun. Plays on the idea of packing (Web_pack_). And the setup it affords should be very brief.
oooh I like that one too @basham. What do you think @HenrikJoreteg? I could go for suitcase or briefcase.
:+1: for briefcase! I recently demoed this library at a local meetup and it had a very positive reception, but people had trouble remembering the name (I think partly because in the local dialect, HJS sounds a lot like AJS or HAS). I did explain that it stands for Human JavaScript. :smiley:
Should we rename, or should we just let this be? I think hjs-webpack has a nice ring to it to be honest, and it's gained a lot of traction under that name.
I suggest we either close this issue or get on renaming it to :briefcase:.
