Harry Wilde
Harry Wilde
> Also it seems difficult (impossible?) to evaluate both the prior and likelihood in a single execution of the model. By this I presume you mean separately evaluating just the...
Ah I see, yeah it is a funny one because this whole approach is only required for anything external to `DynamicPPL`, in the model structs present in the packages I...
Any potential for this to be implemented in the near future? I think potentially even just running `renv::snapshot(prompt = FALSE)` might be sufficient on a certain set of files?
Thanks!
Is there a way to do it without the dep on `assertthat`? @lorenzwalthert @fh-mthomson
Thanks for the quick response @tompollard , I have had a look and cannot find it there either. I noticed a few of the other figures either are there or...
Any planned fix for this?
FI @mwouts I built this small package to use internally https://github.com/nestauk/pre-commit-hooks if you test it out you may notice in practice the minor issues I highlighted on my prev. issue....
I think you are correct, I rescaled the objective using the initial total of one of the components and it has disappeared, thank you!
The issue still stands I think as it does seem impossible to tweak this parameter, but less urgent for me anyway!