Hadrian Tang

We might want to enable this with ReadOnlyMemory\ and Memory\ too.

My first suggestion that gets championed!! ❤️😆

https://stackoverflow.com/a/28783110/5429648 doesn't fix this.

https://stackoverflow.com/a/58753349/5429648 seems to be helpful.

Should we allow all these options or just prerelease?

>We are definitely not changing the default behavior. That would unnecessarily break everybody who is already depending on it. I'm interested in what scenarios this will break. I'd say tests...

xUnit v2 already "broke customers" by running classes in parallel by default: https://xunit.net/docs/running-tests-in-parallel It makes sense for xUnit v3 to improve on this by running methods in parallel by default...

Here are the nupkgs of the latest CI build: [TrieNet.1.0.4-master-d67a1d83940e88397145cbf9ee6e73ab0c1ebec8.zip](https://github.com/gmamaladze/trienet/files/4836962/TrieNet.1.0.4-master-d67a1d83940e88397145cbf9ee6e73ab0c1ebec8.zip)

Bump. A symbolic math library without a parser? Absolute blocker for me. The search for a symbolic math library with a parser continues.

It's implemented? Or will not implement?