Hajo Rijgersberg

Thanx too! Ah yes, that it's both a unit and a quantity. Good suggestion. The consequence however is that it will have many properties, I have to think about that....

Sorry, it has been a while that we have discussed this issue. I still think it is a very important issue. Using constants as units happens in many domains. Would...

Thanks, Athanasios! A very good question. In principle, an ontology should meet needs. These needs must be accepted, to a certain extent, in the (or a) community. For example, an...

Yes, discussion is fine! :) Indeed, the property is not in Figure 1. I should include it. I didn't because the hasValue property relates to the field of statements. It...

Dimension one is indeed the dimension that is related to unit one. The dimension has for all base dimensions (i.e., length dimension, mass dimension, time dimension, etc.) the exponent 0.

Yes, correct! :)

Thanks, but this is an issue which is not clear to me yet. It is unclear whether abampere and biot are one and the same unit or two units that...

Thanks, dr Short Hair! Indeed, Wikipedia regards them as one and the same unit. But other sources don't!

A quick google: - https://www.unitconverters.net/current/abampere-to-biot.htm - https://www.convertunits.com/from/abampere/to/biot - https://www.flightpedia.org/convert/1-abampere-to-biot.html - https://www.inchcalculator.com/convert/abampere-to-biot/ - https://www.unitsconverters.com/en/Biot-To-Abampere/Unittounit-179-180 - and many more. These are unit convertors. Most of the unit convertors seem to regard abampere...

Agreed, these unit convertors are not the strongest arguments. Thanks for your refs! The sources state that abampere and biot are even equal to a third unit, the franklin, but...