Hajo Rijgersberg

Hey Jan Martin, thanx this looks great! The only thing is, we need to keep om-2.0.rdf as the source file, in its present form. Could you adapt your pipeline such...

Also, at this stage, I think we should not change the format of the version numbers. So, could you keep the format *.*.*? I have to dive into what kind...

Thanx again so much for your response, Jan Martin. You know how much I appreciate all your effort. > It is easy to adapt the pipeline to use om-2.0.rdf. That...

> I updated the pull request to use om-2.0.rdf. That is so fantastic, Jan Martin, many thanx! Please allow me to ask some questions, just for my understanding: 1. So...

Hey Jan Martin, Just saw your message come in, and coincidentally also had the opportunity to respond. Clear answers, thanx. However (unfortunately there is a 'but' here), the original om-2.0.rdf...

Hey Jan Martin, thanx but I meant that also the _pipeline_ should not alter om-2.0.rdf. Could you perhaps adapt that accordingly, i.e., that the pipeline will not affect om-2.0.rdf in...

Hi Jan Martin, and again my apologies for my late response and thanx again for yours! :) Indeed I thought files from this repository were changed. I'll study it soon...

Hi Jan Martin, Sorry that it took so long. There are so many things for me to dive into (I mean other than only this issue of course). I'm sure/convinced...

> It is not directly visible in the yml file itself, but obvious from the general way how GitHub handles files. (...) > Of course, a workflow could also push...

Very interesting subject, thanx for raising this. I see the relevance. Would you advocate not working with subclasses of quantities? In principle, the dimension could (or would?) be a (the?)...