Clarify License

[jmkeil]

Please clarify the license. Currently it is state in om-2.0.rdf that it is provide under CC-BY, but the license version is omitted. Moreover, it has become a good practice to refer to the license as entity by e.g. stating:

<dct:license rdf:resource="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>

instead of

<dc:license xml:lang="en">This document is available under Creative ... </dc:license>

Please not that the property license is contained in http://purl.org/dc/terms/ (dct) not in http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ (dc).

Regards, Jan Martin

[HajoRijgersberg]

Thank you, Jan Martin! I'll get to work with this issue. I'll come back to this soon! Best, Hajo

[HajoRijgersberg]

Processed the issues above in a new version of OM, just uploaded.

[jmkeil]

Thank you. Unfortunately, the "L" in the IRI https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ must be written in lower case. Otherwise it does not point to the right entity and page.

[HajoRijgersberg]

Corrected. New version just uploaded! Thanks!