fix: Inconsistent/broken behavior in `parseDate`
This is a rebasing of PR #3988 by @maranomynet on top of the current main branch.
Some minor changes relative to the commits in #3988:
- changed
asserttoexpectin tests - file names changed from
.jsto.ts - in index.tsx, removed
minDateparameter when callingparseDate
Other than that, same changes and same commit messages with the same 4 commits as PR #3988.
Contribution checklist
- [X] I have followed the contributing guidelines.
- [X] I have added sufficient test coverage for my changes.
- [X] I have formatted my code with Prettier and checked for linting issues with ESLint for code readability.
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 96.93%. Comparing base (
ff8b043) to head (88a9dd4). Report is 33 commits behind head on main.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5036 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 96.87% 96.93% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 30 30
Lines 3358 3324 -34
Branches 1414 1395 -19
==========================================
- Hits 3253 3222 -31
+ Misses 105 102 -3
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Can you take a look at the merge conflicts? I think we can release this with a major upgrade soon.
This should be ready to be merged, but let me know if any further work is required.
Hey all, any thoughts on when this might merge? This is quite valuable for data consistency
@jseibert I think because this is a breaking change, it requires a major version bump.
@martijnrusschen Is there any timeline for a v8.0 release?
@martijnrusschen Happy New Year! This has been pending for a while now, any chance this could be merged and released as v8?
This one is next on my list. Can you help make sure there are no merge conflicts?
Merge conflicts have been resolved.