C-CDA-Examples icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
C-CDA-Examples copied to clipboard

Compound Medications

Open dstarh opened this issue 6 years ago • 3 comments

Is there a standards based means of describing a compound medication within ccda?

The FHIR docs mention it but I do not see anything in ccda that directly correlates.

dstarh avatar May 09 '18 15:05 dstarh

Great question.

Unfortunately, no guidance in current spec -- best fall back is probably free text, but happy to have someone else chime in. Do you have an example med for two for us to consider?

brettmarquard avatar May 09 '18 16:05 brettmarquard

I've got 3 real world examples from our physicians:

  1. 40% Urea 2% Fluconazole 0.2% Mometasone in gel
  2. 5% Imiquimod 5% Fluorouracil 5% Cimetidine 15% Salicylic Acid 0.2% Deoxy-D-Glucose
  3. 1% Fluticasone 2% Levocetirizine 0.5% Pentoxifylline 3% Prilocaine 15% Gabapentin in silicone gel

dstarh avatar May 10 '18 13:05 dstarh

@dstarh @brettmarquard

So I would start with the way that medications are typically represented. See an example here: https://github.com/HL7/C-CDA-Examples/blob/master/Medications/Med%20oral%20QID%20with%20PRN/Med%20oral%20QID%20with%20PRN(C-CDA2.1).xml

Then I would sub line 70 for <code nullFlavor="OTH" >

And then place whatever information you have on compound medication as text or code references. For the text reference, you would provide a tag to the human readable narrative: <originalText><reference value="#YourTagHere" /></originalText>

Being ambitious, I went to see if there was a concept in RxNorm for the first compound...there wasn't so below is an example of how you could just map ingredients as translation elements:

<translation code="11002" displayName="Urea" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.88" />
<translation code="4450" displayName="fluconazole" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.88" />
<translation code="108118" displayName="Mometasone " codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.88" /> 

The translation mappings may not be something that everyone in HL7 would agree with, so as Brett suggested, the human readable reference is probably safer in that circumstance.

Cheers, John

jddamore avatar May 10 '18 14:05 jddamore