Henrique Silvério

> With the two existing devices, channels have the same but the parameters are different actually. Yes, there is no requirement associated with the name given to the channels, so...

> Yes, I just take into account the channel_id. From a given channel, I check if the channel_id is available on the target device, if so I declare the channel...

> Let's assume I replace channel A with channel B, channel A respecting a given criteria allowing this switch. To make the new sequence realising quite the same task as...

> > > Yes, I just take into account the channel_id. From a given channel, I check if the channel_id is available on the target device, if so I declare...

Awesome! By the way, the features needed for the simulation part are being introduced in PR #390, you can take a look already if you want. Relevantly here, you'll have...

Good point @LucasGitQ ! Do you need this feature soon or can we leave it for newcomers?

Update: The above requirement is indeed too restrictive. A very minimal, but useful addition, would be to plot a line marking the \Omega threshold that enforces a given blockade radius...

Hi @LaurentAjdnik ! Sorry for not getting back to you on this sooner. I'm always in favour of having some systematic way of doing things, so I am on board...

One other thing: I believe that sometimes the built-in errors are abused, mostly out of laziness to not wanting to create a new error class. I would be in favour...

I think this is great, I have no objections. My only concern is the size of the error factory call becoming larger than the written message itself, and perhaps it...