Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador

> @GutoVeronezi do we need more work on this? (except for conflict resolution) I think we are good with the code; however, I want to try it a bit more...

> ok @lucas-a-martins let's hold on this PR, and continue when we have a consensus in #8746 ? I do not see why we need to wait that discussion to...

@winterhazel, as this PR fixes the 404 error, it's `Types of changes` should be defined as `Bug fix`.

> I'm not so sure we should abandon `private Date computeAdjustedTime(Date initialDate, TimeZone targetTZ)`, this will have to be tested in strange scenarios. I've seen Cloudstack installations have trouble with...

@DaanHoogland I am building it right now to test. Hope I can post my results until the end of the day.

@DaanHoogland @winterhazel While trying to test this one (comparing the results without and with the patch), I faced an error with the Usage Server on the branch `main`. I created...

@weizhouapache, could you describe the objectives of this feature and how you expect it to work?

Hello @weizhouapache You can check PR #6460 that explains why the LB traffic is not blocked with ACL rules and how to achieve that.

Implementing the ACL rules in the `FORWARD` chain is the feature's design. We have some limitations with it for sure; why it was designed that way I cannot tell; however,...